Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Sultan

United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Eastern Division

November 21, 2019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF
v.
SHAHJAHAN SULTAN, M.D. DEFENDANT

          KATHLYN VAN BUSKIRK, Assistant United States Attorney

          MARY HELEN WALL, Assistant United States Attorney

          SARA ELIZABETH PORTER, Trial Attorney

          SHAHJAHAN SULTAN, M.D. Defendant

          CHARLES R. MCRAE Date Attorney for Defendant

          AGREED PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE [1]

         Pursuant to a separate Plea Agreement and Plea Supplement between the Defendant, SHAHJAHAN SULTAN, M.D. (hereinafter the "Defendant"), by and with the consent of his attorney, and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (hereinafter the "Government"), agree that the following findings are correct, and further agrees with the adjudications made herein. Accordingly, the Court finds as follows:

         1. The Defendant is fully aware of the consequences of having agreed to forfeit to the Government his interests in and to the hereinafter described property, having been apprised of such by his attorney and by this Court; and he has freely and voluntarily, with knowledge of the consequences, entered into a Plea Agreement and Plea Supplement with the Government to forfeit such property.

         2. The Defendant agrees, the following assets (hereinafter the "Subject Property"):

One (1) 2014 Mercedes-Benz G550, VIN: WDCYC3HF1EX224651

One (1) 2014 BMW 5351, VIN: WBA5B1C55ED4785991

One (1) Diamond Ring purchased from Multi-Facet

         constitute or are derived, directly or indirectly, from gross proceeds traceable to the

         5. The Defendant and his attorney further agree that the Defendant will cooperate with the United States to identify, locate, and dispose of the property subject to forfeiture or substitute assets for such property, and that the United States may immediately begin the seizure of assets to be forfeited as substitute property to satisfy the forfeiture money judgment.

         IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED AS FOLLOWS:

a. That the Defendant shall forfeit to the United States the Subject Property.
b. A forfeiture money judgment in the amount of $2, 324, 945.54 is entered ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.