United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Oxford Division
B. BIGGERS SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE.
court, sua sponte, reviews this pro se
prisoner complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for
consideration of dismissal. The plaintiff complains that
various people have conspired to have him arrested and to
prevent him from being released on parole. After carefully
considering the contents of the pro se complaint and
giving it the liberal construction required by Haines
v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519 (1972), the court has concluded
that the complaint is wholly without substantive merit.
Hill's Previous Case
Hill has filed another case in this court which, in some
aspects, is similar to the present one. See Hill v.
Hill, 3:18CV139-GHD-JMV (N.D. Miss.) As with the instant
complaint and other pleadings, the previous ones were
difficult to construe; as such, the court restated Mr.
Hill's allegations in the interest of brevity and
clarity. Mr. Hill has been involuntarily committed to mental
institutions at least seven times; though he states, "If
s a known fact that I have no mental problem. I am disabled
for seizure disorder.... Also[, I] take no medication at
current time nor ever needed any." Hill v.
Hill, supra, Doc. 8 at 4, 6. He stated,
"There is a very large coven [on the Hill at Midway] and
other place[s] within Tallahatchie County, MS."
Id. Doc. 8 at 6. Mr. Hill alleged that, starting
near Christmastime in 2016:
I was drugged and sexually assaulted by my father and others
watched this and recorded it on [their] phones. It was made
known to me around mid-March of 2017 from a pastor in New
York at a hearing with lawyers and reporters[.] This was done
after I came back from Tri-Lakes West Wing [a psychiatric
institution] in Batesville, MS. My eyes are very good and
I've seen alot. There are a number of informants for the
federal authorities I myself went into the website and signed
up for this and have been contacted and watched the money
distributed out by the others. Not only myself was assaulted
or exploited[, ] my sisters and their children[, ] male and
I have been sent off seven (7) times to mental institutions
and place in prison for what I know and lived through. Alot
of this may be sealed to protect those who are still alive. I
have seen death at the hands of some and the clean up crews
and what they wear. I never one time lost courage in the face
of death or when they tried to say I was seeing things.
Id. Mr. Hill made other, similar assertions
throughout his pleadings. He also alleged that various
people, inside and outside of government, are conspiring to
prevent his release on parole. At some point a court sent Mr.
Hill "to the State Hospital at Whitfield like he was
seeing things and the abuse never occurred."
Id. at 5. Mr. Hill became concerned when "[an]
MDOT truck follow us into town front and back, then Parole
and Probation would arrive wherever I was at, telling me I
owed them money for being in jail." Id. at 6.
Mr. Hill also states, "All this has to do with
government contracted informants." Id.
present case, Mr. Hill makes similar allegations. He alleges
that his parole was improperly revoked because his is a
confidential informant, stating that he "told [the
Constable] there was money and types of federal and states
evidence here on the property and in my personal room and
that my number was C9 CI and had an emergency contact in
Quitman County." Doc. 6 at 4. He also alleges that other
confidential informants have been "left to run
wild," interfering with his supervised release. Doc. 6
at 2. He believes that these confidential informants are
staying in a "Federal Site under seal of the
Court," but the informants have caused some type of
"damage." Id. In a letter addressed to the
United States Attorney General, he states:
This is a CI, C9 James I. Hill currently on a Federal
Administer Site in Tallahatchie County, MS 38948 1348 Tatum
Pond Rd Oakland, MS 38948 outside of Charleston, MS. I have
been arrested by those who seek to obtain Federal Evidence
and have placed it at risk. Your help is needed ASAP!
Doc. 6 at 45. The plaintiff also alleges that he, himself, is
"a Site Administrator and CI for Federal
Authorities...." Doc. 6-1 at 3.
the previous case, the plaintiff believes that he is a
confidential informant in charge of a "Federally
Administered Site." He believes that, as a confidential
informant, he reports directly to the United States Attorney
General - and that a conspiracy exists among a host of people
in various jobs and walks of life (inside and outside of
government) to prevent his release on parole. The court has
not included the minutiae from the plaintiffs submissions
because they make little sense and have no impact on the
decision in this case.
carefully considering the contents of the pro se
complaint and giving it the liberal construction required by
Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519 (1972), the court has
concluded that the complaint is without substantive merit.
The complaint consists entirely of the plaintiff s belief
that he is a high-level confidential informant - and that a
many people have conspired to arrest him, frustrate his
communication with those to whom he reports, and prevent him
from being released on parole. He has been ...