Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Stone v. Epps

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Aberdeen Division

November 21, 2017

TED STONE PETITIONER
v.
CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS RESPONDENT

          ORDER

          DEBRA M. BROWN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         This civil rights action filed by pro se prisoner Ted Stone is before the Court on remand from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals for a determination of the timeliness of Stone's notice of appeal. Because Stone timely deposited his notice of appeal with prison officials, the notice of appeal is timely.

         I

         Procedural History

         On May 22, 2017, this Court entered an order and separate final judgment dismissing Stone's federal habeas petition with prejudice. Docs. #28, #29. Stone acknowledged receipt of the final judgment on June 1, 2017. Doc. #30.

         On July 5, 2017, this Court received a notice of appeal from Stone. Doc. #31. The notice of appeal is dated June 21, 2017, and includes a postage stamp dated July 1, 2017.

         On October 24, 2017, the Fifth Circuit issued an order observing that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a) and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(1)(A), the final day for Stone to file a timely notice of appeal was June 21, 2017. Doc. #36. The Fifth Circuit noted that “[a] prisoner's pro se notice of appeal is timely filed if deposited in the institution's internal mail system on or before the last day for filing.” Finding that “it cannot be determined from the record in this case whether the petitioner delivered the notice of appeal to prison officials for mailing on or before June 21, 2017, ” the Fifth Circuit remanded the case to this Court for such a determination.

         Following remand, United States Magistrate Judge Roy Percy ordered the parties to “submit mail logs, affidavits, and/or additional information relevant to the timeliness” of Stone's notice of appeal. Doc. #37. On October 26, 2017, the respondent submitted an affidavit of Gia N. McLeod, the Director of the Inmate Legal Assistance Program (“ILAP”) for the Mississippi Department of Corrections (“MDOC”), along with the “complete log of all mail sent out through the ILAP office for Inmate Ted Stone MDOC #160170 between June 1, 2017, and July 31, 2017.” Doc. #38-1.

         On or about November 2, 2017, Stone filed an “Interim Response to Court Order.” Doc. #40. In this response, Stone claims that, considering the computation of time under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, his notice of appeal was timely because it was delivered for mailing within thirty days of the date he actually received notice of the Court's judgment. On the same date he filed his interim response, Stone also filed a motion seeking to compel ILAP to notarize his affidavit and submit documents. Doc. #41.

         On November 6, 2017, Magistrate Judge Percy denied Stone's motion to compel and ordered Stone to submit a declaration under penalty of perjury “setting forth the date that his notice of appeal was deposited in the prison's mail system[.]” Doc. #42. Eight days later, the Court received from Stone a “Response to Court Order, ” Doc. #43; an “Objection to State's Response, ” Doc. #44; and a motion to appoint counsel, Doc. #45.

         II

         Relevant Facts

         Stone's response includes an affidavit which avers that, on Sunday June 18, 2017, he submitted a written form to ILAP requesting that ILAP pick up his notice of appeal. Doc. #43 at 2-3. This written request by Stone represents that the deadline for filing the notice of appeal was June 21, 2017. Id. at 3.

         According to Stone, ILAP picks up legal mail the Wednesday following the date of a pickup request. Id. at 2. Under this schedule, Stone's notice of appeal should have been picked up Wednesday, June 21, 2017, the notice of appeal deadline. However, ILAP refused to pick up Stone's ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.