JEFFREY RIVERS A/K/A JEFFEREY J. RIVERS, APPELLANT
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, APPELLEE
COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HINDS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/27/2013. TRIAL JUDGE: HON. WILLIAM A. GOWAN JR. TRIAL COURT MOTION FOR POST-CONVICTION RELIEF DISMISSED.
FOR APPELLANT: JEFFREY RIVERS (Pro se).
FOR APPELLEE: OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, BY: ELLIOTT GEORGE FLAGGS.
BEFORE IRVING, P.J., BARNES AND FAIR, JJ. LEE, C.J., IRVING AND GRIFFIS, P.JJ., BARNES, ISHEE, ROBERTS, CARLTON, MAXWELL AND JAMES, JJ., CONCUR.
NATURE OF THE CASE: CIVIL - POST-CONVICTION RELIEF
¶1. On November 18, 2008, Jeffrey Rivers appeared in Hinds County Circuit Court and pled guilty to cocaine possession under Mississippi Code Annotated section 41-29-139 (Rev. 2013). The court sentenced
Rivers to eight years, with eight years suspended and five years' supervised probation. On March 15, 2012, the court revoked Rivers's suspended sentence and ordered him to serve the remaining four years of his suspended sentence in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections.
¶2. Rivers filed his motion for post-conviction relief (PCR) on December 17, 2012. His motion was summarily dismissed on February 27, 2013. Rivers now appeals the dismissal of his PCR motion, claiming that he received an illegally lenient sentence in 2008. Finding this issue time-barred, we affirm the judgment of the circuit court.
STANDARD OF REVIEW
¶3. The circuit court may summarily dismiss a PCR motion without an evidentiary hearing " [i]f it plainly appears from the face of the motion, any annexed exhibits and the prior proceedings in the case that the movant is not entitled to any relief." Miss. Code Ann. § 99-39-11(2) (Supp. 2013). To succeed on appeal, the movant must: (1) make a substantial showing of the denial of a state or federal right, and (2) show that the claim is procedurally alive. Young v. State, 731 So.2d 1120, 1122 (¶ 9) (Miss. 1999).
¶4. When reviewing the dismissal of a PCR motion, an appellate court " will not disturb the [circuit] court's factual findings unless they are found to be clearly erroneous." Callins v. State, 975 So.2d 219, 222 (¶ 8) (Miss. 2008) (citations omitted). Our review of the summary dismissal of a PCR ...