REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
F. KEITH BALL, Magistrate Judge.
I. Introduction and Procedural History
This is an action for federal habeas relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Presently before the Court is the motion to dismiss filed by Respondent. Petitioner has not responded to the motion. Having considered the motion, the undersigned recommends that it be granted and the petition dismissed with prejudice.
Johnny Grogan pleaded guilty in the Circuit Court of Scott County, Mississippi, on June 1, 2007, to one count of sexual battery in cause no. 07-cr-002 and two counts of gratification of lust in cause no. 07-cr-004. He was sentenced that same day to serve twenty years on the sexual battery count and two years on each gratification of lust count, the sentences in cause no. 07-cr-004 to run consecutively to each other and to his sentence in cause no. 07-cr-002.
On June 26, 2008, Grogan filed a motion for post-conviction relief (PCR) alleging that his guilty plea had not been made knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily. Although Grogan specifically referenced cause no. 07-cr-002 on the front page of the motion, the body of the motion discussed his pleas in both cases. The court denied the motion on October 13, 2008. Grogan did not appeal the trial court's denial of relief.
Grogan filed a second PCR motion in the trial court on May 22, 2010. Again, although he indicated on the title page that his motion challenged the judgment in cause no. 07-cr-002, his arguments concerned his guilty plea on the gratification of lust counts as well as the sexual battery count. By order dated June 28, 2010, the court dismissed the motion as successive. Grogan filed an appeal, and on November 8, 2011, the Mississippi Court of Appeals entered an opinion affirming the trial court's dismissal. Grogan v. State, 89 So.3d 617 (Miss. Ct. App. 2012). In so doing, the court of appeals limited its review to cause no. 07-cr-002, noting that pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. § 99-39-9(2), a PCR motion must be limited to one judgment. Grogan's petition for a writ of certiorari to the Mississippi Supreme Court was denied on June 7, 2012. He filed his § 2254 petition with this Court on or after May 12, 2013.
II. State Court Cause No. 07-cr-002
Respondent seeks dismissal of Grogan's challenge to his conviction for sexual battery, state court cause no. 07-cr-002, as untimely. The Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) imposes a one-year statute of limitation for petitions for writs of habeas corpus under § 2254:
(1) A 1-year period of limitation shall apply to an application for a writ of habeas corpus by a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court. The limitation period shall run from the latest of
(A) the date on which the judgment became final by the conclusion of direct review or the expiration of the time for seeking such review;
(B) the date on which the impediment to filing an application created by State action in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States is removed, if the applicant was prevented from filing by such State action;
(C) the date on which the constitutional right asserted was initially recognized by the Supreme Court, if the right has been newly recognized by the Supreme Court and made retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review; or
(D) the date on which the factual predicate of the claim or claims presented could have been discovered through the exercise of due diligence.
(2) The time during which a properly filed application for State postconviction or other collateral review with respect to the pertinent judgment or claim is pending shall not be counted ...