Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Allred v. Allred

March 23, 1999

LEESA CRIM ALLRED APPELLANT
v.
JUDSON MOORE ALLRED, III APPELLEE



Before McMILLIN, P.j., Diaz, And King, JJ.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: McMILLIN, P.j.

DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/24/1997

TRIAL JUDGE: HON. WILLIAM HALE SINGLETARY

COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HINDS COUNTY CHANCERY COURT

NATURE OF THE CASE: CIVIL - DOMESTIC RELATIONS

TRIAL COURT DISPOSITION: APPELLANT HELD IN CONTEMPT AND WAS ORDERED TO PAY ATTORNEY FEES.

DISPOSITION: REVERSED AND RENDERED IN PART AND REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART - 3/23/99

MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED:

CERTIORARI FILED:

MANDATE ISSUED:

¶1. Leesa Crim Allred had appealed a ruling of the chancellor finding her to be in wilful contempt for her failure to abide by the terms of the judgment of divorce from her former husband, Judson Moore Allred, III, regarding Mr. Allred's visitation rights with the children of the parties. She also claims that the chancellor abused his discretion by finding Mr. Allred to be in contempt as to certain other provisions of the divorce judgment relating to finance and property but in failing to use the coercive powers available to him to force Mr. Allred to comply with the judgment. We conclude that Mrs. Allred is correct on both scores and we, therefore, reverse and render in part and reverse and remand in part.

I.

Facts

¶2. Mrs. Allred was granted a divorce on the ground of Mr. Allred's uncondoned adultery in November 1994. Rather than actively contest matters relating to division of property, claims for spousal support, child custody, and child support, the parties amicably resolved these issues in a written agreement submitted to the chancellor. The chancellor approved the terms of the agreement and incorporated it by reference into the judgment, thereby vesting the terms of the agreement with the force of a court order. Under the agreement, Mrs. Allred was awarded primary custody of the two minor children of the parties. The agreement defined Mr. Allred's visitation in the following terms:

"HUSBAND shall have visitation with the children in accordance with guidelines and schedules established by Dr. Gerald O'Brien who is the children's psychologist. HUSBAND shall meet with Dr. O'Brien at HUSBAND's expense for this purpose prior to exercising any visitation. All guidelines and schedules recommended by Dr. O'Brien shall be first submitted to WIFE by Dr. O'Brien for approval, which shall not ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.