Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Scruggs v. Shelby

February 09, 1999

H.D. SCRUGGS AND WANDA ETHERIDGE APPELLANTS SCRUGGS
v.
CAROLYN SHELBY, VIVA K. KYLE, GLORIA APPELLEES ANN PETTEY, JERRY DONNELL KYLE, BRENDA JOYCE KYLE, CAREY D. KYLE, WANDA B. PETTEY, BRIAN THOMAS PETTEY, JONATHON MICHAEL PETTEY, THEIR HEIRS, ASSIGNS, DEVISEES, LEGATEES, EXECUTORS, ADMINISTRATORS, SUCCESSORS TO ANY OF THE ABOVE AND OTHER UNKNOWN PARTIES IN INTEREST



Before Thomas, P.j., Diaz, And Southwick, JJ.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Diaz, J.

DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/01/97

TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JOHN C. ROSS JR.

COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: LEE COUNTY CHANCERY COURT

NATURE OF THE CASE: CIVIL - PROPERTY DAMAGE

TRIAL COURT DISPOSITION: JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF APPELLEES

DISPOSITION: REVERSED AND REMANDED - 02/09/99

MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED:

CERTIORARI FILED:

MANDATE ISSUED:

¶1. H.D. and Wanda Scruggs, the appellants, contest the chancellor's decision to allow Carolyn Shelby, the Kyles, and the Petteys, the appellees, to maintain a prescriptive easement on the appellants' property. Feeling aggrieved by this decision, the appellants argue the following issues on appeal: 1) the chancellor erred in placing the burden of proof on the appellants, 2) the chancellor erred in finding that the appellees proved by clear and convincing evidence that their use of the appellants' property was hostile and under a claim of right, 3) the chancellor erred in finding the appellees proved by clear and convincing evidence that their use of the appellants' property was exclusive, and 4) the chancellor erred in finding that appellees' alleged prescriptive easement had not been abandoned. Since the first issue is dispositive, we do not address the other issues or the cross appeal. Finding this first assignment of error meritorious, we reverse and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion

FACTS

¶2. This case arose from a dispute over an alleged prescriptive easement maintained on approximately two acres of the appellants' property in Lee County. In 1953, John T. Houston acquired sole ownership of the West Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 2, Township 11 South, Range 5 East in Lee County, Mississippi. At that time, T.D. Pettey owned the South Half of the East Half of the Southeast Quarter. When T.D. died in 1954, title to this tract passed to his wife and children. In the late 1960's, George Monroe Pettey and Huel L. Kyle, the husband of T.D. Pettey's daughter, Viva, constructed two earthen dams along the natural drain which crosses the Southeast Quarter and flows into Chiwappa Creek forming two lakes. Eventually, the upper lake backed up onto the property owned by Houston and flowed under an existing fence line which separated the East and West Halves of the Southeast Quarter.

ΒΆ3. In 1976, George Monroe Pettey died. In August 1978 a formal division was made of the South Half of the East Half of the Southeast Quarter between his children, George Thomas Pettey, Gloria Pettey, and George ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.