Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Naylor v. State

December 03, 1998

DARYL L. NAYLOR, A/K/A DARYL LOVE NAYLOR
v.
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI



Before Pittman, P.j., Roberts And Smith, JJ.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Pittman, Presiding Justice, For The Court.

DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/05/97

TRIAL JUDGE: HON. L. BRELAND HILBURN, JR.

COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HINDS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

DISTRICT ATTORNEY: EDWARD J. PETERS

NATURE OF THE CASE: CRIMINAL - FELONY

¶1. Daryl Naylor was indicted along with Jeff Jones on August 6, 1996, for the possession of cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-139 (1993). The indictment was amended before trial enhancing the penalty under Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-152 (Supp. 1994), which provides for a possible double penalty for violators of Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-139 (1993) who are in possession of a firearm at the time of the arrest. Naylor and Jones were tried together starting on March 20, 1997 in the Circuit Court of the First Judicial District of Hinds County, and the jury returned a guilty verdict. Naylor was sentenced on May 5, 1997 to a term of fifteen (15) years, with ten (10) years suspended and three (3) years of supervised probation.

¶2. Naylor filed a Motion for j.n.o.v. or in the alternative a new trial on May 6, 1997, which was denied by the trial court. Naylor timely filed his Notice of Appeal to this Court seeking a new trial or in the alternative a reversal and rendering of his conviction. He alleges the following errors for this Court's consideration:

I. THE VERDICT OF THE JURY WAS UNSUPPORTED BY AND CONTRARY TO THE EVIDENCE, AND THE COURT SHOULD HAVE GRANTED NAYLOR'S PEREMPTORY INSTRUCTION AND MOTIONS FOR DIRECTED VERDICT.

II. THE TRIAL COURT ERRONEOUSLY DENIED NAYLOR'S "TWO-THEORY" INSTRUCTION.

III. THE COURT SHOULD HAVE GRANTED NAYLOR'S CHALLENGES FOR CAUSE OF VENIRE MEMBERS, BOONE, EVERETT, WHITE, WILSON, AND HAYNES.

IV. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED BY REQUIRING NAYLOR AND JONES TO AGREE UPON SIX PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES.

V. THE TRIAL COURT SHOULD HAVE GRANTED JURY INSTRUCTION DN-6.

VI. THE TRIAL COURT SHOULD HAVE SUSTAINED NAYLOR'S MOTION OBJECTING TO REFERENCE TO DRUG PARAPHERNALIA DURING THE PROSECUTION'S OPENING STATEMENT.

VII. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN DENYING NAYLOR'S OBJECTION TO IMPROPER CLOSING ARGUMENTS BY THE ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY.

STATEMENT OF THE FACTS

¶3. The State called Detective Steven E. Wilson of the Jackson-Hinds County Drug Enforcement Unit as its first witness. At the time of trial, Wilson had been employed with the Jackson Police Department for fourteen years, and had been working narcotics for approximately twelve of the fourteen.

ΒΆ4. On September 19, 1995, Detective Wilson and seven other officers served a search warrant at 2311 Woodlawn Street. Before arriving at the house, it was decided that four officers would approach the front of the house, while the other four attempted to enter from the back. This type of entry helps to ensure the element of ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.